In
the next few weeks, I will blog about different learning theories used by
teachers in their 21st century classrooms. I will look at the
Behaviorist Learning Theory this week.
You decide if this should be a component in an exceptional classroom.
Last
week in my college class, “Bridging Learning Theory, Instruction, and
Technology,” Dr. Pat Wolfe explained the different parts of the brain and their
connection to learning in the classroom (Laurette Education, 2011a) Dr. Wolfe said we need strong neuro
connections in the brain (Laurette Education, 2011b ) and repeated practice
strengthens those connections and pathways.
Practice does not make perfect as a student may be practicing
incorrectly, but practice does make permanent.
Chapter
2 of Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works is titled “Reinforcing
Effort and Providing Recognition.” Many students
do not realize that their effort in the classroom and with assignments has a
correlation to their success. “Effort is
the most important factor in achievement.” (Pitler, Hubbell, & Kuhn, 2012. p
57). Teachers must understand this and
be ready to teach the importance of effort to their students. Some teaching practices could include keeping
track of student effort and achievement over a period of weeks, or recognizing
student effort on a classroom or school bulletin board or website. Recognition of the effort students put forth can
be a positive reinforcement for them, and a challenge to other students to put
more effort into their work.
Chapter
7 in Using Technology with Classroom Instruction that Works is about “Assigning
Homework and Providing Practice.” I read
that “in general, students need to practice upwards of 24 times before they
reach 80 percent competency” (Pitler, Hubbell, & Kuhn, 2012. p 168). Teachers can help their students practice the
24+ times that are needed through technology.
Homework helps “students familiarize themselves with new concepts as
well as to practice, review, and apply what they’ve learned.” (Pitler, Hubbell,
& Kuhn, 2012. P 167). The drill and practice of instructional interactive
technology such as Starfall or Cognitive Tutor can help students reach that 80
percent competency.
Behaviorism
is a theory that stimuli can have the same response over time. It is observable and measurable. In many of the drill and practice programs on
the computer, the student sees the same thing over and over again – the stimuli. When the student responds correctly, they get
a reward. When the student responds
incorrectly, they get a punishment. The
reward can be points to accumulate or it can be a smiley face. The punishment can be not being able to move
to the next level or it can be a repeat of that stimuli.
John
B. Watson and B. F. Skinner were two of the first Behaviorist who helped shape
this theory. Watson had a basic
stimuli-response theory. Then Ivan
Pavlov experimented using a dog, a bell, and food to condition the dog to
salivate. This is knows as classical
conditioning. Finally, Skinner extended
the stimuli-response theory by rewarding part of the desired behavior. This is operant conditioning.
Teachers
use this theory when they have students practice math skills at www.xtramath.com or www.aaamath.com. Students can
practice upwards of 24 times at these drill and practice sites.
Teachers
use this theory for behavior in the classroom.
Classroom teachers frequently use behavior modification, contracts, and
consequences. This can be as simple as a
smile after they answer a question correctly or a word of praise. This can be more serious as writing up a
contract that the student, teacher, and parent signs.
There
is no feeling or emotion with this stimuli-response theory. There is no higher order thinking
skills. Does Behaviorism have a place in
outstanding classrooms?
Resources
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011). Program one:
Understanding the brain [Video webcast]. Bridging
learning theory, instruction, and technology. Retrieved
from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2011). Program two: Brain
research and learning [Video webcast]. Bridging
learning theory, instruction and technology. Retrieved
from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=5700267&CPURL=laureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2594577&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
Orey, M. (Ed.). (2001). Emerging perspectives on
learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Main_Page
Pitler, H., Hubbell, E. R., & Kuhn, M.
(2012). Using technology with
classroom instruction that
works
(2nd ed.). Alexandria,
VA: ASCD.
Great post, I really like the technical references you used to help the reader understand your ideas. I also really connected to the part where you said practice doesn't make perfect, but permanent. That is something to think about when we are teaching. We really need to have a plan for our students so they are not lost or practicing something the wrong way. we already have limited time with them and we don't want to have to spend it reteaching and trying to erase the wrong practice the students already have. Thanks for the links I will check into those sites.
ReplyDeleteThank you Kevin,
ReplyDeleteMy last year's first graders came into my class at the end of August having practiced their names with capitals in the middle and at the end and not writing on the line. They had practiced incorrectly all year. It was a very hard thing to reteach them the proper way to write their name. I do not blame the kindergarten teacher as much as I blame her "coach" who would not allow her to make any corrections. The teacher was afraid of losing her job. The "coach" had fired the previous teacher.
I know from experience that practicing incorrectly over and over again... will make that permanent. It was very hard to get them to change the way they wrote their name.
Writing a name is a very small learning behavior, but this was only one of their practiced behaviors that needed correction.
I am happy to say that the "coach" is no longer with us and a new kindergarten teacher was excellent. I am looking forward to having these students in my classroom at the end of August.
Sharon